STS-61-C was the twenty-fourth mission of NASA’s Space Shuttle program, and the seventh mission of Space Shuttle Columbia. It was the first time that Columbia, the first operational orbiter to be constructed, had flown since STS-9. The mission launched from Florida’s Kennedy Space Center on 12 January 1986, and landed six days later on 18 January.
Links to original photos:
http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/QuickView.pl?directory=ISD&ID=STS61C-31-2
http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/QuickView.pl?directory=ISD&ID=STS61C-31-3
A blind student’s roommate isn’t human — uncover the chilling true story behind the Human–Alien… Read More
Witnesses in New Bern, North Carolina, captured photos of a triangular UFO with three bright… Read More
During a live broadcast from the International Space Station, a mysterious object flew past before… Read More
New global UFO and USO sightings show glowing ocean objects and transmedium craft. Experts say… Read More
Brazilian doctor confesses to studying and communicating with a live alien from the 1996 Varginha… Read More
A scientist uncovers details of a secret Las Vegas UFO program that aimed to study… Read More
This website uses cookies.
View Comments
The size of the object can be smaller than assumed. It depends on the distance to the camera lense, for example it could be "only" the size of a car if it was just 200ft or so away...
I agree, the distance is paramount before anyone can honestly comment.
So then it's just a smaller ufo, right? All I know is what I see, and it looks a lot like those triangle craft being reported around the world, and if it's in space, the idea that it may be some secret American "blimp" type craft is debunked.
I just wonder two things; how can anyone say the pictures are fake and what do those people who say it is not alien think it is? And I don't know how some statement like this could explain the Phoenix lights can be made either. Assumptions and leaps always seem to be made, stick to the facts, and the trutch shall be revealed....eventually.
If only NASA had called me, or any of a hundred million other people, we could have loaned them a cheap camera capable of taking a photograph that does not make your eyes water trying to discern something out of the fuzzy blur. It amazes me how we all just accept this visual garbage as if it was the best they can do.
It seems odd that we can see a bald spot on a skinny guy, but they couldn't get a better picture?
looks like a B2 of some sort ...